Left-Leaning Freedom Lover
Click here for code to display this image

Description

Below:

You desire substantially less government control of personal activity and somewhat less government control over economic activity than is presently the case in the U.S. I used to classify this area as part of “Moderate Libertarian;” but got many objections; I guess calling you a moderate libertarian is akin to calling a liberal Democrat a &ldqup;moderate communist.;”

Your views would be best represented by a mix of Libertarian and Democratic representatives—assuming that it was possible to get a significant number of Libertarians elected. The Libertarian Party is still dominated by people far more radical than you though there is an ongoing effort to make the LP more inclusive and less radical. If you have the patience and willingness do deal with infighting, you may want to join this effort. Or, you might find my proposed new party more to your liking.

Approximately 14% of the takers of this quiz scored in this area.


Political Parties and Related Organizations

The Libertarian Party was created to radically cut government—more than you want. Nonetheless, you might want to check them out to see if you want to add some Libertarians to the mix of D's and R's currently in power, since the D's and R's are making government bigger than you want.

Libertarian Reform Caucus So, you want more freedom but you think the Libertarian Party is too radical? The Libertarian Reform Caucus consists of freedom lovers who want to turn the LP into a real political party, one that balances idealism and political reality.

Business Plan for a New Party

Not happy with the existing parties? Would you like to see a political party that was concerned about freedom and equality? Would you like to shrink big government and big corporations?

I am contemplating starting such a party. It could be either a new party or reforms to one of the existing third parties. In my Business Plan for a New Party I seriously address the challenges inherent in third party politics in the United States. Third parties generally fail, because the system is rigged against third parties. However, there are a couple of interesting loopholes...

The Republican Liberty Caucus

Democratic Freedom Caucus The Democratic Freedom Caucus. Yes, there is a caucus within the Democratic Party that calls for smaller government, but like other Democrats, they are greatly concerned with equality.

Thomas Paine Network


Liberty and Other Values

Holistic Politics

Freedom, equality, morality, nature,...these are all good things. All to often, political debate rages over which is more important. Synergies get overlooked. There is a better way, holistic politics. By looking at multiple values at the same time, it is possible to come up with creative solutions for the world's problems, solutions that make all the factions more happy.

The Other Foe of Free Enterprise. These days, most people think of socialism as being the opposite of free enterprise. Historically, this has not been the case. Best selling science fiction author David Brin points out the other, much more dangerous, foe.

Marginal Revolution

Think economics is just about predicting interest rates? Think again! Marginal Revolution is a very interesting economics blog written by professors at George Mason University.

The Free Liberal

The FLOW Project

Libertarianism

Political Strategy

The Leadership Institute

The Leadership Institute. Provides quality training in "political technology" for conservatives and libertarians.

Essays on World Liberation. Once upon a time, I was a hardcore activist in the Libertarian Party, going so far to sit on the National Committee and be on the Strategic Planning Team (SPT). These essays are an outgrowth of said experiences and my experiments in the field. Since then, I have been informed by “real” Libertarians that the LP should be a protest organization, and that I have been corrupted by my attempts at Libertarian victory. However, if you think the purpose of the LP is to actually elect libertarians, these old essays may prove useful.

Take Back Your Government, by Robert A. Heinlein. A handbook for grassroots political activism from the days before professional consultants and television. Dated, but still useful.

Dedication and Leadership by Douglass Hyde. An inside look at how the Communist movement was so successful in advancing its radical agenda. Many of the ideas are apropos for building up the political movements in general. Must reading for anyone doing third party politics.


Read to Lead

Law's Order, by David Friedman. OK, so you believe in property rights, right? So where does your property begin and mine end? Do I have the right to turn on the lights or do the photons that hit your property constitute tresspass? What if those photons come from a high powered laser?

OK, that was an extreme example, but there are many real world examples where the simplistic view of property rights fails. Dr. Friedman gives them a hard look. People will take your ideas more seriously if you do too.

The Machinery of Freedom, by David Friedman. This book looks at the economics of government itself. What are the incentives of those who govern? To what degree are they motivated to promote the general welfare?

The answer: not very much. For this reason Dr. Friedman is an anarchist. But you don't have to be in order to benefit from this book. Indeed, knowing the inherent difficulties in making government behave is more important for those who like government big than for those who like it small.

Simple Rules for a Complex World, by Richard Epstein. It would be nice to simply say that private property is good and that initiation of force is bad and build a legal system based on this dictum. Alas, the real world is not so simple. Legal scholar Richard Epstein points out the holes and suggests additional axioms to make a complete legal system for a free society.

Fuzzy Thinking, by Bart Kosko. Fuzzy Logic is one of the biggest advancements in philosophy to come around in a long time. It deals with the imperfect mapping between words and reality. Must reading for the philosophically inclined, especially followers of Ayn Rand or Murray Rothbard.

A Perfect Mess by Eric Abrahamson and David H. Freedman. Does your office have a clean desk policy? Does it try to document all processes in the name of efficiency? Are planners trying to remake your home city? Do you think that the laws should be based upon a clean axiomatic framework? This book provides a powerful antidote to such thinking. Reality is multi-dimensional, and the results can be...messy.


Fun Reading for Freedom Lovers

The Futurological Congress, by Stanislaw Lem. Imagine a utopia—or is it dystopia—based on hallucinogenic drugs. Inspired by life in communist Poland. Quite a hoot!

Alastor, by Jack Vance. A collection of three light science fiction novels connected by the same broad background. The third, "Wyst," is by far the best, and the one that is relevant. "Wyst" is a comedy that takes place in something much closer to the Marxist ideal than was ever achieved during the 20th century. Takes a fair look, both sympathetic and skeptical, towards a true "Egalistic" society. The amusing characters and dialog alone make this well worth reading.

Parliament of Whores by P.J. O'Rourke. A hilarious but informative look at the workings of U.S. government. (Avoid if you find the occasional four-letter word to be objectionable.)

Eat the Rich by P.J. O'Rourke. A very funny survey of various economic ideas, from around the world. On-the-spot coverage of the consequences of various economic ideas, where they were applied. In this one, O'Rourke plays fair, with chapters such as "Good Capitalism," "Bad Capitalism," "Good Socialism," and "Bad Socialism."

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, by Robert A. Heinlein. Good fiction for freedom lovers. This one turned me into an anarchist for about a decade.

That Hideous Strength by C. S. Lewis. Part III of Lewis' space trilogy. The plot has some fascinating parallels to Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged despite the fact that Lewis was a devout Christian while Rand was a devout atheist.